Comments on: Okay to look? What? http://scottbush.net/v2/blog/2007/12/24/223/ Like Facebook, but with far fewer readers. Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:20:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: bradleyjpaul http://scottbush.net/v2/blog/2007/12/24/223/#comment-380 bradleyjpaul Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:01:15 +0000 http://scottbush.net/v2/blog/2007/12/24/223/#comment-380 I've seen that ad all over the place, and I think it's general enough to not specifically imply adultry. In my own reading, I think the ad is trying to reach out to people still feel online dating carries a stigma with it. Coincidentally, I just realized stigma must be derived from stigmata. That's pretty cool. And my thoughts on adultry? I think in its strictest and most traditional definition, it's wrong. But, I also think that there are a bunch of different ways to define a relationship, and one person's adultry may be another's status quo. It's all up to the people involved and open communication. I’ve seen that ad all over the place, and I think it’s general enough to not specifically imply adultry. In my own reading, I think the ad is trying to reach out to people still feel online dating carries a stigma with it.

Coincidentally, I just realized stigma must be derived from stigmata. That’s pretty cool.

And my thoughts on adultry? I think in its strictest and most traditional definition, it’s wrong. But, I also think that there are a bunch of different ways to define a relationship, and one person’s adultry may be another’s status quo. It’s all up to the people involved and open communication.

]]>