Your dog doesn’t need shoes
27 July 2008“Of course they don’t!” I hear (sane, normal) people thunder when they read this post’s title. “I agree!” I scream back. That’s how passionate I am about dog clothing. We’ve all seen the dreaded dog sweater, which is horrible (note how most of the dogs are chihuahuas or other miniscule purse-living dogs). Yet, in some sick way I can almost understand how it can be cute or funny or just a way to sell a university logo to alumni with too much disposable income.
But not dog shoes. No. The line must be drawn here.
“Surely you jest!” shout the masses of normal people. “I do not!” Is my reply. Gasps of shock all around as I present… “bark ‘n boots”
I ran into these abominations at a tent sale at a sporting goods store, which I can only hope means they were shunned long enough to be marked down thrice and shuffled off to the parking lot to be sold with the cheap LED camping lanterns no one wanted.
The crux of the issue is this: dogs were wild animals who walked, ran, trotted, and jumped all over the place for thousands of years without the need for gortex and nylon around their paws. I can only imagine the poor dog’s discomfort and annoyance after their misguided master tugged them on. (I wonder if they come with one of those cone-shaped collars vets make dogs wear so they won’t chew on their surgical wounds?) Why in the world would a dog want to wear boots?
Luckily, the geniuses at grip trex anticipated that question and were kind enough to answer it, I’m sure after many doggie focus groups or perhaps canine mind-reading sessions. Here’s a photo, but sadly my camera phone doesn’t capture legible text at that size. Let me summarize: a bunch of marketing speak that points out why these brand of dog shoes are better than others (there are other manufacturers?!). I don’t believe “Seamless construction reduces abrasion and improves fit” is a reason why a (sane) dog would want to wear boots. Sure, these might be the equivalent of Birkenstoks, Crocs, or whatever is considered the most comfortable shoes these days… but guess what? DOGS DON’T WEAR SHOES. It’s like a human buying a feather comb. Best feather comb on the market: all-metal construction, gold-tipped ends, etc. but still pointless… to a human.
I could rant for a while longer about pointless products serving a need that doesn’t exist (this, this, or just about anything else sold in a Skymall catalog) but I know it’s futile. People will still buy crap they think they need.
UPDATE: My friend and dog owner, Eric, has commented and pointed out that sometimes these dog shoes are useful safety accessories. His experience (or, his dog Sam’s experience) is probably the reason this product exists. But I stand by my point about doggie sweaters!






Oh, while I so fully agree with you in principle
nusspix | 28 July 2008 | 8:34 pmOh, while I so fully agree with you in principle (and believe me, I really, really do), while hiking an 8-mile, mostly granite trail a couple years back, Sam’s paws (all of them) got torn to bloody shreds. It took her a week to get back to being able to walk normally while it was obvious every step was very painful. She even had a crack in one of her pads that didn’t heal fully for a really long time. We immediately got her those exact shoes and — let me reiterate how much dog clothing annoys the piss out of me — they have been a mainstay in her hiking pack ever since.
We’ve used them a few times the last couple years on especially rocky or sharp terrain and occasionally have had to use just one to protect a bum wheel after bandaging it to keep her paw safe. I don’t consider them accessories as much as medical equipment since they only come out when necessary for her safety.
And no, of course, dogs don’t want to wear boots (as the D-bags in the marketing dept. suggest) but then again, they don’t really want to be pulled around by their necks either. Sometimes safety must rule.